Skip to main content

PRODUCT INNOVATION STRATEGIES AND COST EFFECTIVENESS ON PURCHASING ENVIRONMENT

ATTENTION:

BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!

 

INFORMATION:

YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420

 

 

 

PRODUCT INNOVATION STRATEGIES AND COST EFFECTIVENESS ON PURCHASING ENVIRONMENT

 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

 

Background of the study

A right innovation strategy can help firms to overcome the problems they encounter concern- ing striving for a sustainable competitive advantage (Kuratko, et al., 2005). The firm’s innovation process is guided by an explicit or implicit innovation strategy, which provides direction toward specific resources, and help focus the efforts of the entire organization on common innovation goals (Oke, 2007). In this paper, we analyze empirically the relationship between firms’ choice of innovation strategy and their performance. According to Schumpeter,  firms  have  an  option  to  choose  an  innovation  strategy  involving  product,

process, market or organizational innovation1. This can be termed as simple” innovation

 

strategy, because firms decide to engage in only one type of innovation. Recent evidence, however, shows that a good portion of innovative firms chooses to combine various types of innovation at the same time, i.e. complex innovation strategy (Tavassoli and Karlsson, 2015). Considering both simple and complex innovation strategies, this implies that, in total, firms can choose between sixteen different innovation strategies2. However, both theoretical and empirical studies have devoted minor attention to other innovation strategies than those related to technological innovation (Haned, Mothe & Nguyen-Thi, 2014; Oh, Cho & Kim, 2014). This is clearly a serious limitation, because the co-existence and co-evolution of different types of innovation is important for firm performance (Damanpour & Aravind,

2012). Since productivity gains are related to production efficiency and factor saving, it is argued that an analysis of the effects of innovation on productivity that focuses exclusively on product innovation is indeed too restrictive (Polder et al, 2010).

 

1.2 Statement of the problem

Expanding the scope of analysis of innovation strategies beyond the field of technological innovation is crucial. This will provide a much richer understanding of firmschoices of innovation strategies as well as of the effects of different simple and complex innovation strategies on firm performance (Le Bas, Mothe & Nguyen-Thi, 2015). More complex innovation strategies are more demanding in terms of firm capabilities and we argue that firms that are capable of implementing complex innovation strategies also will achieve a better performance3 (Gera & Gu, 2004).

 

1.3 Objectives of the study

1. To understand the impact of product innovation strategies on cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

2. To understand the relationship between product innovation strategies and cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

 

1.4 Research questions

1. What is the impact of product innovation strategies on cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

2. What is the relationship between product innovation strategies and cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

 

1.5 Research hypothesis

H0: There is no relationship between product innovation strategies and cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

H1: There is a relationship between product innovation strategies and cost effectiveness on purchasing environment

HOW TO GET THE FULL PROJECT WORK

 

PLEASE, print the following instructions and information if you will like to order/buy our complete written material(s).

 

HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)

After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to

08068231953 or 08168759420

 

(1)    Your project topics

(2)     Email Address

(3)     Payment Name

(4)    Teller Number

We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert

 

BANK ACCOUNTS

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 0046579864

Bank: GTBank.

 

OR

Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI

Account Number: 2023350498

Bank: UBA.

 

 

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:

08068231953 or 08168759420

 

 

AFFILIATE LINKS:

myeasyproject.com.ng

easyprojectmaterials.com

easyprojectmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterials.net.ng

easyprojectsmaterial.net.ng

easyprojectmaterial.net.ng

projectmaterials.com.ng

googleprojectsng.blogspot.com

myprojectsng.blogspot.com.ng

https://projectmaterialsng.blogspot.com.ng/

https://foreasyprojectmaterials.blogspot.com.ng/

https://mypostumes.blogspot.com.ng/

https://myeasymaterials.blogspot.com.ng/

https://eazyprojectsmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/

https://easzprojectmaterial.blogspot.com.ng/

 

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AN APPRAISAL OF THE LOAN EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTROL TECHNIQUE IN ZENITH BANK

ATTENTION: BEFORE YOU READ THE PROJECT WORK, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW. THANK YOU! TO GET THE FULL PROJECT FOR THE TOPIC BELOW PLEASE CALL: 08168759420, 08068231953 TO GET MORE PROJECT TOPICS IN YOUR DEPARTMENT, PLEASE VISIT: www.easyprojectmaterials.com www.easyprojectsolutions.com www.worldofnolimit.com AN APPRAISAL OF THE LOAN EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTROL TECHNIQUE IN ZENITH BANK ABSTRACT The role of banks as financial intermediary is crucial to the growth of any society. Primarily, bank supply, such financial services as provision of savings and time deposits, call deposits, working capital and terms l oans, tender and performance bonds documentary collections, fund transfer, foreign exchange transaction, equipment leasing and business advisory services. To the individual and corporate business community, bank loans are a prime source of fun

ROLE OF RURAL WOMEN FARMERS ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF EDO STATE

ATTENTION: BEFORE YOU READ THE PROJECT WORK, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW. THANK YOU! TO GET THE FULL PROJECT FOR THE TOPIC BELOW PLEASE CALL: 08168759420, 08068231953 TO GET MORE PROJECT TOPICS IN YOUR DEPARTMENT, PLEASE VISIT: www.easyprojectmaterials.com www.easyprojectsolutions.com www.worldofnolimit.com ROLE OF RURAL WOMEN FARMERS ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF EDO STATE ABSTRACT The role of rural women farmers in the economic development of Egor Local Government Area in Edo State cannot be over emphasized. There is basicall y no aspect of economic development in Edo State that one cannot find women. A review of feminist literature, indicate that there is now a demand for re-orientation of research and change in methodological procedures used for complication of national statistics so as to reflect accurately the position of women and their la

OWNERSHIP STRUCTURES, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF small MFIs in Nigeria(MSC)

YOU CAN CALL US BACK FOR THE COMPLETE THESIS. WE CAN ALSO HELP YOU WITH CORRECTIONS FROM YOUR SUPERVISOR. PLEASE CALL 08068231953, 08168759420        MSC THESIS TOPIC: OWNERSHIP STRUCTURES, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF small MFIs in Nigeria(MSC)   Abstract The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between ownership structures, corporate governance and the performance of small MFIs in Nigeria. Interest in this study was as a result of poor performance of these MFIs as indicated in the AMFIU Annual report of 2006. The study therefore sought to determine if this could be attributed to their ownership structures and therefore governance levels.   A cross sectional survey design was used to undertake this study using a sample of 65 MFIs from which responses from 44 MFIs were received; giving a response rate of 67.7%.    Findings of the study reveal that ownership structures and corporate governance are significant predictors of MFI performance accounting for 42.4%